Posts Tagged ‘social media’

The Power of Celebrity Tweets?

Friday, December 3rd, 2010

In honor of World AIDS Day, which was Wednesday, Dec. 1st, a group of tweet-tastic celebrities vowed to stay silent on their social networks until a total of a million dollars was raised for their charity

How’d that work out, you ask?  Well, the day came and went and apparently they’re much closer to $100,000 than $1,000,000 so far, prompting quite a backlash in the blogosphere.  With posts titled “People Hate Kim Kardashian’s Tweets More Than AIDS” and readers commenting about how they would donate more money if it meant keeping these celebrities silent forever, I’m guessing Kim Kardashian, Lady Gaga, Usher and some of the other participating celebs may be regretting their decision to join the “cause.”

Don’t get me wrong – raising money to help people affected by AIDS is GREAT.  And we all know that once they just can’t handle dealing with their “digital deaths” any longer, any one of these multi-millionaires can donate the ransom money themselves to be able to type their every thought once again.  They just might actually realize that some people don’t care…

Happy Anniversary, YouTube!

Friday, April 23rd, 2010

YouTube’s first video was uploaded five years ago today – April 23, 2005 – by co-founder Jawed Karim. 

How awesome would it be to be one of those elephants…or one of the founders.

Mashable

Google BUZZ!

Wednesday, February 10th, 2010

Watch out social media world, this morning Google launched their much-whispered-about BUZZ social media functionality, which integrates your social networking accounts.

7,359 Text Messages in One Month?

Wednesday, February 10th, 2010

Text MessagingThat’s what my 16-year-old granddaughter Myranda told me she had in December in a matter-of-fact description of the happening.

 

I had earlier read a report that among this younger demographic, text messaging had not only far surpassed e-mailing, but conversation.  The report also stated that 500 text messages a day by this demographic is not unusual…that amounts to 15,000 a month.  Myranda told me she has a friend who had 17,000.

 

Maybe this revolution in communication involving these staggering numbers of messages by individuals has been in the news, but I’ve missed it.  The volume is apparently made possible by unlimited text messaging use for a modest sum per month, in Myranda’s case, about $30.   And, the fact that many of these people can type fast, about 6 characters a second or 360 per minute, which translates to about 60 words per minute, some of them without looking, even pecking away with the phone in a pocket.

 

Apparently, according to the Wireless Association, there were more than 740 billion text messages sent/received during the first half of 2009. That’s an average of 4.1 BILLION text messages sent/received each day. And, that’s nearly double the number from the previous year, when only 385 billion text messages were reported for the first half of 2008. 

 

Myranda tells me that among her acquaintances, the usual circle of friends that text each other on a regular basis ranges from 5 to 12 people.  The texting usually starts when they get home from school, and can go on for six or more hours until they go to bed.  They text while watching TV, listening to music or doing homework.  However, they are limited to 160 characters per message, and so they can do homework, watch TV, et al, while waiting for a response.  Probably good training for multi-tasking.  As Myranda pointed out, one of the axioms of this form of communication is that “social life through texting doesn’t stop.”

 

The texting also goes on while a circle of friends are together in-person at get-togethers including overnights.  I said to Myranda, “why don’t you just talk to each other?”  She says they do, but they will text one another if it is a private matter.

 

On the other hand, I was at the home of a good friend who asked me to look at a group of friends of her three daughters who were sitting in the family room, all texting.  Who are they texting I asked?  Each other, she said. Okay, makes perfect sense, I said.

 

As I look back, I’m thinking that if I could have just texted my ex-wives across the dinner table instead of talking to them, I might have saved a lot of alimony.

We are go.

Monday, February 8th, 2010

I grew up across the freeway from the Johnson Space Center, so the goings on at NASA have always been fascinating to my brothers and me. —One of who fell so in love that he went on to become an aerospace engineer at Lockheed and a lead on the MAVEN project. (I’m a proud big sister!)

In the pioneering landscape of social media, it makes sense that NASA is well-seated on that wagon.
Check out TWEETS FROM SPACE.

(Did that sound like The Muppet Show announcer from “Pigs…In…Space?” -’Cause it was supposed to.)

YouTube video of this morning’s Shuttle Endeavour launch.

    Astonaut Soichi Twitpics only minutes ago from over Sakura jima, JAPAN. Active volcano, which errupted recently.

Astonaut Soichi Twitpics only minutes ago from over Sakura jima, JAPAN. Active volcano, which errupted recently.

Look At Me!…

Thursday, February 4th, 2010

NO, WAIT, STOP LOOKING AT ME!

In yet another glimpse at the fascinating inevitable convergence (i.e. ‘head-on car wreck’) of technology and personal identity, Microsoft recently announced the release of its miniscule auto-snapping Vicon™ camera, capable of being worn on a necklace and documenting up to 6 days of moment-to-moment daily life and interactions.viconrevue

 

 

The device, which was originally designed for more altruistic purposes of Alzheimer’s patient support, will reportedly soon be available to the consumer market—though for what purposes one can only imagine. Indeed, apart from the obvious issue it raises of who in the world could be so interesting as to watch for days at a time, it offers a more interesting observation altogether on an emerging sort of ‘author-consumer’ conflict  that the whole social-media environment continues to illustrate.

That is: a person who at one moment rails against retail sales clerks asking for their address to complete a simple cash purchase, or cries foul at customer service departments for soliciting participation in a survey at the end of a crappy phone call with some $3 per hour drone in Bangalore, and then the next runs home or pulls out their phone to foist every pedestrian, mundane detail and image of their lives into the public sphere.

 

So what gives? How do we reconcile the two? By understanding them as actually very different, even antithetical things. Not as apples-to-apples behaviors but rather a distinct cause and effect: one is a collective cultural force, the other a set of sterile technical practices that precipitated it.

 

It’s increasingly apparent that, at heart, the ‘new’ social media phenomenon is really driven by a very old innate need for identity and recognition—for some small proof that we still actually matter—only now on steroids in response to an increasingly vast, impersonal, disconnected world bent on starving it. It is a movement born less of technology, than as a sort of rebuttal to it and the ways it was being employed to invade our privacy by governments and corporations: essentially blunting their power to intrude by exposing ourselves (or the parts we choose) first. 

 

Similar to the way that racial epithets are co-opted by an aggrieved group to defuse their impact, our new exhibitionism and self-fascination are ultimately direct, natural human responses to the devaluation and even indignity inflicted by most interactions or experiences today. Meaning that posting some fish-eyed photo of my visit to the bank teller is less about me personally than my ability to turn the tables and starring role on the world, and then boast about it. The act empowers me, if only in some small way.

 

So, what then are we to make of Microsoft’s newest ‘life caching’ device? If you accept my totally unverifiable reasoning here, quite simply this: that social media is increasingly revealing itself as less a ‘technological’ trend, as initially thought, than a sociological one. It is a trend rooted more in the neuroses, appetites and human hard-wiring of psychology than in the circuitry of the phones, PDAs and laptops that facilitate it. The tools change, the disc storage grows, and the components shrink. But the behavior and its causes are as simple as elementary school playgrounds, and about as likely to change much until the world ever does. 

 

The camera, in short, is a mildly intriguing novelty, one of many to come. Why we want or need it at all is the far bigger and more interesting story.

DieHard Viral Video

Thursday, January 14th, 2010

Check out this great viral video from our client DieHard, it made it on the Top Ten Viral Video chart from Ad Age.  Visit DieHard.com to view all 3 viral videos!!

 

Click here to see the video.

 

 

Beyond the babble

Thursday, August 27th, 2009

Value of Twitter (and other social media sites) for capturing human sentiment

If you happened to see the results of a study conducted in early August regarding the value of activity on Twitter, it probably would come as no surprise to find that 40% of the content was classified as “pointless babble”.  Pear Analytics, the research firm who conducted the study, gathered a sampling of 2,000 tweets over two weeks and put them into 6 buckets….News, spam, self-promotion, pointless babble, conversational and pass-along value.

However, the good thing about this study was it also revealed that 37% of content fell into conversational and 8% pass-along value.  That seems to imply that personal opinions are being cast: movie reviews, restaurant ratings, recommendations and other forms of personal expression.  And it probably involves conversation about what they wear, drink, eat, listen to and drive.  From a market research standpoint this emerging field of “sentiment analysis” can offer opportunities for MSI clients to listen in on how people talk about their brands and translating human emotion into hard data.

The number of these social media information tracking companies is growing.  A recent strategic partner of MSI’s in this specialized area is a company named Brickfish.  They are all about connecting brands with consumer conversations online.  Find out more by going to www.brickfish.com/

What’s Your e-Handicap?

Monday, May 4th, 2009

Odds are, you’ve probably been challenged with the philosophical question, “Which one of your five core senses could you do without?” (You know, sight, hearing, smell, touch and taste). In reality, if you had to give up one, you would be at a handicap as compared to the rest of society.

A similar concept can also apply to electronic communication. With our texting, internet surfing, blogging, YouTube postings, Facebook updates and twittering, branding our personalities and re-branding others, there are some definite repercussions on our intellect, personalities and behavior compared to what might have existed 10 or more years ago without these technological advancements.

As an interesting, non-scientific research project, I ask you to choose one of the following handicaps that you would be most comfortable living without as it relates to electronic communication/social media. Post your selection here and MSI will post a final tally in a few weeks.

A.  No more txting 4 me.

Rules/Regs: In addition to never texting anyone, you also can’t view any text messages sent to you. Texting in general is disabled on your phone. It’s all back to actual conversations and face-to-face interactions for you. Might be a good idea to stock up on some mints…

B.  I will log-off my email for life.

Rules/Regs: Whether for professional or personal use, your email accounts will be permanently frozen. While having to leave your desk to walk down the hall to communicate to co-workers could add to your “friendly-factor” around the office and add a few thousand more steps to your pedometer, how would your communication with your clients or vendors change? Also, a trip to the post office is in order, you’re going to need some stamps!

C.  I will “unfriend” Facebook forever.

Rules/Regs: No more logging on for your daily fix, scouting for past classmates or former loves, telling your network of friends that you prefer wheat bread over white bread or taking a quiz that proves you are the champion at recognizing “Movies from the 80s”. Your newsfeed ends now, my non-Facebook-friend. And you can’t even change your status update to “MIA.”     

D.  I will turn the channel on YouTube to Never.

Rules/Regs: When everyone else in the free world is talking about the clip of a guy losing an arm to an alligator or a news anchor going postal on camera, you have to just hope it appears on the evening news or there is a still shot in the newspaper the next morning. You can no longer experience immediate gratification when it comes to wanting to watch videos of puppies sleeping. You are not allowed to look at YouTube, or open any links sent to you of videos on YouTube. YouWhat?  That’s right – it’s no longer in your vocabulary.

E.  I have Googled my last Google.

Rules/Regs: Never again can you use Google or any other internet search engine to instantly find out whether a peanut is a nut or a legume (and I’m not telling), get a recipe for any type of macaroon you could possibly be craving, find a map with the location of your dinner date or even zoom in on a photo of your house taken by the amazing Google Earth satellites.  You may just want to answer the door the next time the Encyclopedia Britannica salesperson comes knocking…